Dak Prescott Won’t Speak on Head Coach Jason Garrett Cowboys Future

Dak Prescott Won't Speak on Head Coach Jason Garrett Cowboys Future

Dak Prescott Won’t Speak on Head Coach Jason Garrett Cowboys Future. He just wants to mind his own business.

On Thursday, Cowboys QB Dak Prescott was questioned by ESPN’s Ed Werder for his thoughts regarding head coach Jason Garrett’s status after their team faces off against the Washington Redskins in Week 17. Dak had an interesting but smart response. Read on to see why Dak Prescott minding his own business on Jason Garrett…

CelebNSports247.com reports that the Dallas Cowboys quarterback Dak Prescott gave a passionate answer while speaking on his own free agency.

Here is what Dak Prescott told Werder:

I think it’s the last game on [my contract] as well. so I will be damned if I speak on anyone else’s future or their place.

If you recall, in 2015, the Cowboys gave Garrett a 5-year, $30 million extension. Meanwhile, Prescott is coming to the end of his 4-year rookie deal.

Michael Gehlken reports:

A for head coach Jason Garrett’s future with the team, it has been talked about all season.

It appears that everything is up in the air since the team being unable to secure a victory over a team with a record above .500 until they faced the Rams late in the season.

The Cowboys have gone 84-67, including 2-3 in the postseason since Garrett took over head coaching duties in 2010.

As for Dak, having thrown for 4,599 yards, 26 touchdowns, and 11 interceptions with a 64.8 percent completion rate across 15 games in 2019, Prescott is sure to get his money and remain with the franchise.

Garrett’s future is not as bright.

What do you think of Dak Prescott minding his own business on head coach Jason Garrett?

About the author

Ocho

Omar, 34, hails from Los Angeles. He is a graduate of the University of Northridge. Omar has been in entertainment for 12 years working in production and writing. Omar who goes by Ocho and keeps you in the know about hip hop, Movies, Reality TV and Sports.

1 Comment